Turn diligence into a usable integration workflow baseline: not a stale deck

Sapeum helps M&A and PMI teams capture how work actually happens across the target and acquiring organization, structure it into usable workflows, and compare current-state with future-state changes as integration decisions unfold.

Book an M&A/PMI demo See it in action

Challenges

Common challenges across M&A and post-merger integration

Diligence outputs are hard to reuse after close

Interview notes, process maps, and target operating model decks rarely give integration teams a durable workflow record they can update and rely on once Day-1 planning begins.

Current-state and future-state are hard to compare credibly

Integration teams often know the desired end state at a high level but lack a structured view of roles, handoffs, decisions, and exceptions needed to evaluate what must actually change.

Workflow knowledge gets rebuilt repeatedly

Corporate development, integration leaders, consultants, and functional teams often repeat the same discovery and mapping work because prior documentation is too static or fragmented to build on.

Change history and accountability are difficult to preserve

As integration decisions accumulate, it becomes harder to trace which workflow changed, who approved it, what exception was introduced, and how the future-state evolved over time.

Synergy discussions drift away from operating reality

Synergy targets may be clear in the model, but teams still need a trustworthy workflow baseline to test whether the combined organization can support the proposed change path.

How it works

How Sapeum fits the M&A and integration lifecycle

  1. 01

    Capture the real current-state early

    Document how critical workflows actually operate during diligence and early integration planning: including steps, roles, systems, decision points, and exceptions. So teams start with a usable baseline.

  2. 02

    Compare current-state to proposed future-state

    Model the intended combined-state workflow and review where ownership shifts, handoffs change, approvals move, or exceptions need new treatment before broader rollout.

  3. 03

    Refine the record as integration evolves

    Keep one versioned workflow record as Day-1, Day-100, and longer-term operating model decisions take shape, rather than recreating process documentation for each phase.

  4. 04

    Support review, governance, and auditability

    Maintain attributable change history and workflow context so integration leaders, functional owners, and audit stakeholders can understand how procedures evolved post-close.

  5. 05

    Reuse what the organization learns

    Carry forward proven workflow patterns, decision logic, and integration approaches from prior deals so each new transaction starts from a stronger operating baseline.

LIVE
Commercial Insurance Claims · 11:47
AB
DM
TS
[B] Set up claim record[Q] Settlementcommittee reviewssettlement[K] Refer claim to SIU[F] Acknowledge claim[L] Assess claim value[H] Set reserves[O] Check settlementauthority[A] Receive FNOL[R] Litigate claim[I] Investigate claim[J] Assess fraudindicators[D] Senior adjuster orspecialist receives claim[G] Confirm coverage[T] Close claim[E] Routine adjusterreceives claim[N] Settle claim[M] Pursue subrogationrecovery[P] Manager reviewssettlement[S] Dispose of salvage[C] Triage and assignadjuster[K.2] Determine SIUoutcome[K.1] SIU investigatesclaim[H.1] Reevaluate reserves[A.2] Policyholder reportsFNOL[A.3] Online portal FNOL[A.1] Broker reports FNOL[R.4] Settle on courthousesteps[R.2] Manage file through suit[R.1] Assign defensecounsel[R.3] Determinelitigation outcome[R.5] Go to verdict[I.1] Engage independentadjuster[I.3] Engage forensicaccountant[I.2] Engage engineer[G.7] Pay claim[G.8] Deny coverage andclose claim[G.3] Review exclusions,endorsements, limits, anddeductible[G.6] Determinecoverage outcome[G.2] Check policy in forceon date of loss[G.5] Investigate underReservation of Rights[G.1] Pull policy[G.4] Issue Reservation ofRights letter[T.1] Reassess claim[N.2] Negotiate settlement[N.1] Account for salvage[R.2.2] Depositions[R.2.1] DiscoveryReally big /7-figureSign offSign offWithinauthorityFraudindicatorsNo fraudindicatorsReopen forassessmentDemandreframes thingsNot coveredHeading towarddenialKick backKick backSettlesCoveredNew factsContinueinvestigationNew info /supplementaldamagePick back upHighseverity/complexRoutineDoesn't settleVerdictCoveragequestionRecoverypotentialLate subrorecoveryAbove authorityDescriptionThe FNOL is set up in theclaims system. A claimrecord is created, and thesystem generates a claimnumber. That claimnumber is how the wholefile is tracked from here.Without a claim number,the claim basically doesnot exist as far as thesystems are concerned.SystemsClaims systemDescriptionFor really large settlements, thematter is escalated to a settlementcommittee for sign-off. Thecommittee can approve it or kick itback and tell the adjuster torenegotiate.DescriptionIf something trips fraud concern, the adjuster refers the claim to SIU, the Special InvestigationsUnit.DescriptionOnce the claim is assigned,the adjuster acknowledgesit. Depending on thecarrier, this initial contactSLA is 24 or 48 hours, andthe adjuster has to reachout to the insured or thebroker within that window.This is not just a formality:early contact sets the tonefor the whole claim, andmissing the SLA getsflagged and follows theadjuster around.The acknowledgementincludes introducingthemselves and letting theinsured or broker knowthey have the claim.DescriptionIf there are no fraudindicators and theinvestigation is complete,the adjuster puts a numberon the claim and assessesit.This is where theinvestigation work cashesout into the actual dollarvalue of the loss.The client framed this asgetting to: are we actuallyon the hook, and howmuch?On a third-party claim, thatmeans assessing who wasat fault and for how much.On a first-party propertyclaim, that meansassessing what it costs tomake the insured whole.DescriptionAssuming coverage is good, theadjuster sets reserves.A reserve is the adjuster's estimate ofthe ultimate total cost of the claimwhen all is said and done, includingindemnity plus expense.The reserve is set early, when theadjuster knows the least.The whole company plans aroundthese numbers; it is money set asideon the books.It is also how the whole companyknows what it owes, even mid-claim.If the reserve is set too low, there is anasty surprise later. If it is set too high,capital gets tied up unnecessarily.It is an educated estimate that theadjuster keeps revising.The client said this gets revisitedconstantly. Every time a new factcomes in, the reserve is reevaluatedand may move up or down based onwhat the facts say.The client emphasized that thereserve is not just paperwork; it is thediscipline of the whole job.It means being forced, on day 3 withbarely any facts, to honestly say whatthe claim is going to cost, and thenhaving the rigor to keep moving thatestimate as the truth comes in insteadof anchoring to the first guess becauseadmitting you were off isuncomfortable.Examples mentioned include:an engineer's reporta bigger repair estimatea lawyer showing upA big reserve change usually pings theadjuster's manager, too.For business interruption claims,forensic accountant reports usuallyfeed back into the reserve.The client emphasized that thesettlement is the visible part, but thereserve is where the claims disciplinereally lives.ProblemsThis is huge, and it's probably thething I lose the most sleep over.Reserve accuracy over the life of aclaim is one of the things the teamgets measured on hardest.If you had to name the one thingpeople get wrong about the claimsprocess, the client said it is reserves.Everybody on the outside thinksclaims is about the settlement, thenegotiation, the big number at theend. New adjusters often think thesame and treat the reserve likepaperwork or an estimate you slap onearly and forget.Where that breaks down, you getleakage:money quietly leaking out of claimsthat should have cost lesssurprise reserve jumps that blow upthe numbersDescriptionThe adjuster checks whether theproposed settlement is within theirauthority limit or needs escalation.Within authority, the adjusterapproves it and the claim movesforward.Above authority, the matter isescalated to a manager, or forreally large claims, to a settlementcommittee. The client emphasizedthat nobody settles a 7-figureclaim on their own say-so.DescriptionFNOL stands for First Notice of Loss. This is where the claim starts: somebody tells us that something bad happened.However it lands, that's the trigger; the clock starts then.DescriptionIf the matter does not settle, it goes into litigation. The client described this as a whole branch of its own.DescriptionAfter reserves are set, the adjuster does the actual investigating.The point is to build the actual factual picture of what happened and what it did.Depending on the loss, that can include:site visit or inspectionrecorded statements from the insured and any witnessesphotospolice or incident reportspulling documentsOn a commercial property loss, the adjuster might be standing in a flooded building.On a liability claim, the work is more paper- and statement-driven.On bigger or more technical losses, the adjuster does not do all of it alone and brings in outside experts as needed.For a business interruption claim, that can include a forensic accountant to figure out what the company actually lost in income. Their reportsfeed back into the claim file and often back into the reserve.During investigation, the adjuster is also asking whether there is subrogation potential — whether somebody else is at fault and the carrier maybe able to recover later.The client clarified that subrogation potential should be flagged early, even though the actual recovery happens much later.DescriptionFraud monitoring is threaded allthe way through the claim, butthere is a real decision point wherethe adjuster watches for fraudindicators.Examples mentioned:the story keeps changingthe loss conveniently happensright after coverage is bumpedupdocumentation does not add upDescriptionHigher-severity or morecomplex claims areassigned here after triage.DescriptionThis comes before figuring out what is owed on the claim. The client emphasized that people outside the business often do not appreciate this step: before spending a dollar, the adjuster has to confirm the insurer actually owes anything.DescriptionThe adjuster closes the file once finalnumbers are in.At closure, reserves are brought downto what was actually paid, and theclaim is marked closed.The client also clarified that a closedclaim can absolutely reopen if newinformation appears, supplementaldamage is reported, or a latesubrogation recovery comes in.A closed claim is not always a deadone; it can pull the file right back intoinvestigation and assessment.DescriptionRoutine claims areassigned to a normaladjuster for handling.DescriptionAfter claim value is assessed, theadjuster settles the claim.The client said this includesnegotiation.The negotiation may be with:the insuredthe claimantthe claimant's or insured's attorneyThere is typically a demand andback-and-forth negotiation. As thatdevelops, the adjuster may need tobounce back and reassess the numberbecause the demand reframes theclaim.The goal is to land on a number bothsides can live with.Once a settlement number is reached,there is an authority gate before it canmove forward to payment.DescriptionSubrogation is consideredduring investigation,including mid-claim. Theadjuster is always askingwhether somebody else isat fault and whether thecarrier can recover fromthem later.The client clarified thatsubrogation potential isflagged early, but theactual recovery is chasedafter payment and caneven come in after the filehas been closed.Example mentioned:if a contractor's faultywork caused the fire, thecarrier might pay itsinsured and then pursuethat contractor, or thecontractor's insurer, torecover the money laterDescriptionFor settlements above theadjuster's authority, the matter isescalated to the manager forsign-off. The manager can approveit or kick it back and tell theadjuster to renegotiate.DescriptionAfter payment, salvage isdisposed of as part ofwrapping up the claimrecovery/offset items.DescriptionThe claim goes through triagebefore it reaches the adjuster.Somebody, or partly the routingrules in the system, looks at theline of business, the complexity,and the severity, and assigns theclaim to the right adjuster.A fender bender on an auto policyand a warehouse fire are not goingto the same person. The big, hairy,high-severity stuff routes to asenior adjuster or a specialist. Theroutine stuff comes to a normaladjuster.SystemsClaims systemDescriptionDepending on what SIU finds, theteam either picks the claim backup or heads toward a denial.DescriptionAfter referral, it issomewhat out of theadjuster's hands. SIU runsits own investigation, andthe claim might pausewhile that happens.DescriptionDuring the life of the claim,the adjuster revisitsreserves repeatedly as newfacts come in. The reservecan move up or downbased on updatedinformation.This requires the rigor tokeep moving the estimateas the truth comes in,instead of anchoring to thefirst guess becauseadmitting you were off isuncomfortable.Examples mentioned:engineer's reportbigger repair estimatea lawyer showing upa settlement demandthat reframes theexposureA big reserve changeusually pings the adjuster'smanager.ProblemsIf the adjuster anchors tothe first guess instead ofmoving the reserve as factscome in, the processbreaks down and createsleakage:money quietly leakingout of claims thatshould have cost lesssurprise reserve jumpsthat blow up thenumbersFrequencyConstantlyDescriptionThe policyholder reportsthe loss directly.DescriptionThe FNOL comes throughthe online portal. This ishappening more andmore.SystemsOnline portalDescriptionThe broker calls or emailsthe FNOL in.DescriptionMost litigated matters stillend up settling shortlybefore trial.DescriptionThe file is managed through suit. The client said this can last years.FrequencySometimes yearsDescriptionDefense counsel isassigned once the claimgoes into litigation.DescriptionMost litigated matters still settle onthe courthouse steps, but some goto a verdict.DescriptionSome litigated mattersproceed through trial to averdict.DescriptionUsed when boots on theground are neededsomewhere the adjustercannot be.DescriptionUsed on a businessinterruption claim todetermine what thecompany actually lost inincome. The forensicaccountant's reports feedback into the claim file andusually back into thereserve.DescriptionUsed for structuralquestions. For example, todetermine whether a rooffailed because of the stormor because it was alreadyin poor condition.DescriptionSometimes the threadresolves fine and the claimis paid.DescriptionSometimes the matterends in a coverage denial,and the claim closes rightthere without anindemnity payment.DescriptionThe adjuster reviews thepolicy details, includingexclusions, endorsements,the limits, and thedeductible.The policy is a contract,and the answer to whetherthe claim is paid lives inthat contract, not in howsympathetic the loss is.If the coverage is notclear-cut, the adjusterlooks for whether the lossmight fall under anexclusion or whether anendorsement changesthings.DescriptionThe coverage question ultimatelyresolves one way or the other afterthe investigation thread plays out.DescriptionThe adjuster confirmswhether the policy was inforce on the date of loss.DescriptionAfter the Reservation ofRights letter is issued, thecarrier keeps investigatingand helping the claimantwhile the coveragequestion is still beingworked through.DescriptionThe adjuster pulls thepolicy as the starting pointfor the coverage review.DescriptionIf there is a real coveragequestion, the adjusterissues a Reservation ofRights letter.It basically says: we aregoing to keep investigatingand helping you, but weare not waiving our right todeny coverage if it turnsout this is not covered.It protects the carrier'sposition while theinvestigation continues.DescriptionWhen a closed claimreopens, the file may needto be reassessed, not justreopened administratively.The client described this asbeing pulled back intoinvestigation andassessment.DescriptionThe adjuster negotiates thesettlement with theinsured, the claimant, orincreasingly their attorney.There is usually a demandand back and forth. As thatnegotiation unfolds, theadjuster may need tobounce back and reassessbecause the other side'sdemand reframes things.The goal is to land on anumber both sides can livewith.The adjuster cannot simplyagree to any number; thereis a real gate in the form ofthe adjuster's settlementauthority limit.If the proposed settlementis within the adjuster'sauthority, they approve itthemselves and move itforward. Above that, theyhave to escalate forapproval. Nobody settles a7-figure claim on their ownsay-so.DescriptionIf there is a damaged assetwith leftover value, salvageis accounted for as part ofsettlement.DescriptionDepositions occur as partof the litigation branch.DescriptionDiscovery occurs as part ofthe litigation branch.
DM
SME: "…unless it's flagged, then it goes through the exception path first."

Resources

See it in action

Browse all resources

Capabilities

What Sapeum helps M&A and PMI teams do

Structured workflow capture from diligence onward

Document target and acquirer workflows as steps, roles, handoffs, decisions, systems, and exceptions so the operating picture stays useful beyond diligence.

Current-state and future-state comparison

Compare baseline workflows with proposed integration designs to spot ownership gaps, redundant reviews, brittle handoffs, and unresolved exceptions before they become execution problems.

Versioned integration knowledge

Preserve workflow history and attributable change as teams refine Day-1 plans, Day-100 designs, and longer-term operating model decisions.

Workflow-grounded integration suggestions

Use Sapeum to surface areas worth review: such as repeated handoff friction, unclear ownership, or inconsistent exception handling; based on the workflow record teams are maintaining.

Reusable patterns across deals

Build a structured library of integration patterns and workflow approaches from prior transactions so future deals start with better context, not just old slides.

Scenarios

Where Sapeum fits across the deal-to-integration lifecycle

Diligence baseline

Capture target current-state workflows in a structure integration teams can use directly, rather than handing off static interview notes and one-off process decks.

Synergy assumptions

Ground synergy discussions in specific workflows, roles, handoffs, decision points, and system dependencies so assumptions are easier to test and refine.

Current vs. future state

Compare how work happens today with the proposed combined-state design before changes are rolled out broadly.

Change governance

Preserve version history, attributable edits, and approval context as workflows evolve through Day-1, Day-100, and steady-state redesign.

Operational continuity

Give integration, transformation, and audit stakeholders a shared operating picture without replacing ERP, ITSM, GRC, or other category-specific systems.

Pattern

Built around how M&A and integration actually work

Common pattern

Diligence knowledge often sits in decks and workstreams, leaving integration teams to reconstruct how work actually happens once the deal closes.

Operating-model reality

Current-state and future-state discussions break down when teams lack a shared workflow baseline detailed enough to compare roles, handoffs, and decisions.

Transformation pattern

Process mapping during integration is often repeated by different teams because prior work is hard to reuse, trust, or update as conditions change.

Governance pattern

As workflows change across the combined entity, leaders need a credible record of what changed, who changed it, and where exceptions or approvals still require attention.

FAQ

Frequently asked

Why is Sapeum relevant for M&A and PMI teams?

M&A and PMI teams need a reliable picture of how work actually happens across the target and the combined company: not just org charts, system lists, and slideware. Sapeum helps capture workflows in a structured form with steps, roles, handoffs, decisions, and exceptions so diligence findings stay usable through integration planning and operating model changes.

How does this support synergy tracking?

Sapeum gives teams a clearer baseline for the workflows behind synergy assumptions. That helps integration leaders compare current-state and future-state designs, trace what changed, and keep synergy discussions grounded in operating reality rather than unsupported narrative. It is not a synergy execution system; it helps teams maintain the workflow record those plans depend on.

How does this reduce transformation waste?

Most integration teams rebuild process understanding repeatedly: once in diligence, again for Day-1 planning, again for Day-100 redesign, and again when issues surface post-close. Sapeum reduces that rework by preserving a versioned workflow record that teams can refine over time instead of recreating from scratch.

How does this help with compliance and audit?

Where controlled change and procedure governance matter, Sapeum preserves version history, attributable edits, approvals, and documented exceptions in the workflow record. That gives audit, compliance, and integration leadership a clearer view of how operating procedures evolved across the combined entity without positioning Sapeum as the system of record for every downstream control activity.

Keep exploring

Related solutions

View all solutions

By industry

Energy

In energy, the hard part usually isn’t knowing that a process should change. It’s getting a trustworthy view of how w…

By industry

Financial Services

Financial processes often break down at approvals, handoffs, exception paths, and cross-functional reviews. Sapeum he…

By industry

Government & Public Sector

Capture real workflows across policy, service delivery, compliance, and cross-agency coordination so teams can create…

Built to SOC 2 standards

Sapeum is designed with enterprise-grade security practices from the ground up: encryption at rest and in transit, role-based access controls, and auditable change history.

Learn more

Make integration something your firm builds on: not rediscovers

If your team is carrying critical diligence knowledge in decks, struggling to compare current-state and future-state operating models, or defending synergy plans without a clear workflow baseline, Sapeum can help create a living operating record that carries from diligence through Day-100 and beyond.

Book an M&A/PMI demo Talk to us about integration workflows